-
The economic impact of the Indian diaspora - October 1, 2024
-
JOKE OF THE DAY : What do you call a lazy kangaroo? - October 1, 2024
-
Vegetable Fried Rice Recipe - October 1, 2024
-
LONDON: Indian-Origin Teen In UK Gets “Life-Changing” Cancer Treatment - October 1, 2024
-
JOKE OF THE DAY : I was going to tell a time traveling joke. - August 12, 2024
-
Methi Matar Malai Recipe - August 4, 2024
-
Indian diaspora and economic development of India - August 1, 2024
-
NEW DELHI: Youngsters’ Increasing Stress Levels, Early Onset of Diseases an Alarming Health Trend: Apollo Hospitals Chief - July 28, 2024
-
Rava Idli | Suji ki Idli - May 28, 2024
-
IRELAND: “From 800 to 7,000”: Ireland’s Education Appeal Soars Among Indian Students - May 4, 2024
TORONTO: Microsoft’s passwordless plans lets users switch to app-based login
TORONTO: Microsoft has announced users can
now delete all passwords from their accounts and instead login using an
authenticator app or other solution.
The
technology giant made passwordless accounts available for business users of its
products in March.
And that
system is now being made available to all Microsoft or Windows users.
It said
“nearly 100% of our employees” were already using the new, more
secure system for their corporate accounts.
If
passwordless login is enabled, users re-logging in to a Microsoft account will
be asked to give their fingerprint, or other secure unlock, on their mobile
phone.
And this
is far more secure than using passwords, which can be guessed or stolen,
according to Microsoft.
“Only
you can provide fingerprint authentication or provide the right response on
your mobile at the right time,” it said.
Windows
users will still be able to use quick-login features such as a Pin code,
though.
Some rare
exceptions will still need passwords, such as Office 2010, Xbox 360 consoles,
and Windows 8.1 or earlier machines.
And if
access to the authenticator app is lost – for example, if the phone it is
installed on is lost or stolen or a user forgets when upgrading – backup
options can be used, including:
- Windows Hello facial
recognition, which requires a compatible laptop or special camera - a physical security key,
which must be used on the device logging in - Short Message Service (SMS)
or email codes
But SMS
and email are two of the most common channels for cyber-criminals targeting
specific individuals
And
Microsoft says security-conscious users who have two-factor authentication set
up will need to have access to two different recovery methods.
Prof Alan
Woodward, part of a research team investigating passwordless authentication, at
the University of Surrey, called it “quite a bold step from
Microsoft”.
“This
isn’t just logging into PCs, it’s logging into online services as well” –
including important ones such as cloud storage, he said.
Security
vice-president Vasu Jakkal wrote: “Passwords are incredibly inconvenient
to create, remember, and manage across all the accounts in our lives.
“We
are expected to create complex and unique passwords, remember them, and change
them frequently – but nobody likes doing that.”
Instead,
people tended to create insecure passwords that technically cleared the bar for
using symbols, numbers or case sensitivity – but in order to remember them,
used a repeated formula or the same password on multiple websites.
And that
led to hackers guessing them or revealing them in a data breach and reusing
them.
“Hackers
don’t break in, they log in,” the blog post read.
‘Pummelled home’
The new
passwordless feature greets users with a box saying: “A passwordless
account reduces the risk of phishing and password attacks.”
And once
the feature is set up, a confirmation tells users: “You have increased the
security of your account and improved your sign-in experience by removing your
password”.
Microsoft’s
claims about poor password use were largely true, Prof Woodward said.
“The
message has been pummelled home about what good password hygiene looks like –
but it’s easier said than done,” he said.
Passwords
were a decades-old concept “and maybe the time is now right to start
looking for something different”.
But there
were no currently agreed standards.
“There
are a number of different ways this could be done – and it would be good if
everybody moved on, really, and tried to find a way of doing this,” Prof
Woodward said.